Suara Indonesia News - The AGO arrests the Executive Director of PT Pos Indonesia and a 
number of post office heads on suspicions of graft. 
HANA SURYANA could not hide his disappointment. On Monday last 
week, after being questioned at the Attorney General's Office at 
the Bundar Building, he never suspected that he would 
immediately be taken into detention. "I was shocked," said the 
Executive Director of PT Pos Indonesia. When visited at the AGO 
detention facility on Wednesday last week, he appeared dejected. 
The 51-year-old man is now facing serious corruption charges 
over the embezzlement of PT Pos Indonesia commission fees for 
the dispatch of PT Pos customer letters. 
The AGO suspects that Hana became involved in the dirty practice 
when he held the post of the Region IV Postmaster, which covers 
Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang and Bekasi in 2003-2006. The 
AGO has a number of pieces of evidence in its possession 
including, among others, a written order from Hana on charging a 
6 percent commission, which exceeds the stipulated 5 percent 
maximum. 
According to Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes Marwan 
Effendy, Hana's detention represents a development arising out 
of an investigation into a similar case at the Fatahillah Post 
Office in Central Jakarta earlier in March. The Fatahillah case 
is suspected of causing financial losses to the state amounting 
to Rp14 billion. "It appears that these practices are also 
occurring at other post offices," said Marwan. According to 
Marwan, based on a written complaint sent by an "inside person" 
at PT Pos, state financial losses are as much as Rp45 billion. 
It was from here that the investigation then led to Hana and his 
indictment. 
Prior to Hana's arrest, the AGO had detained a number of other 
PT Pos officials. They include, among others, head of the 
Central Jakarta Post Office, Herbon Optalno, head of the Jakarta 
Mampang II Post Office, Rudi Atas Perbatas, the former head of 
the Central Jakarta Post Office, Her Chaeruddin, head of the 
South Jakarta Post Office, Yosef Taufik Hidayat, and the head of 
the West Jakarta Post Office, Erinaldi. 
The "slowly developing" case of alleged corruption in the 
state-owned postal company began five years ago when a PT Pos 
Director of Operations Circular came to light. The written 
circular regulated matters related to price deductions, 
incentives and commissions for outside parties that used PT Pos 
services. The Region IV Post Office has "big shot" customers 
from at least 20 companies, including among others PT Telkomsel, 
PT Exelcomindo Pratama (XL), PT Bank Negara Indonesia and the 
Sequis Life insurance company. During the AGO's investigation, 
it turned out that these commissions also went into the pockets 
of "Pak Pos" senior post office officials. "There was a receipt 
signed by a PT Pos official. Whereas the commission should have 
been received by the customer," said Marwan. 
The value of the commissions, said Marwan, also appears to have 
been inflated. When Hana held the post of Region IV Postmaster 
for example, he once authorized the head of the Fatahillah Post 
Office, Fahrurozy, to increase commissions to 6 percent. Whereas 
according to the regulations that were cited in the circular, 
the size of a commission should have only been 3-5 percent of 
the value of the transaction. "The money does not appear to have 
been received by the customers," said Marwan. 
The AGO also questioned a number of PT Pos' business customers. 
One particular prosecutor related how one witness stated that 
they had never received a commission. "There was a witness that 
was asked to sign a receipt for Rp2 million, but was only 
treated to a meal," said the prosecutor. According to a number 
of other witnesses, they refused to sign receipts because it was 
not possible for funds that had already been spent on postal 
fees to be returned to the company. They were also unaware of 
the existence of the stipulation on commissions issued by PT 
Pos. "I didn't know there was a regulation on the matter," said 
a witness who was questioned at the AGO. The AGO has already 
conducted two raids on the Region IV Post Office. But despite 
having turned the offices located in the area of Banteng Square 
upside down, the original receipts for the commissions that were 
to be used as material evidence were not found. 
It was these raids that later provoked a protest from Stefanus 
Gunawan, the lawyer representing PT Pos. Stefanus plans to 
launch a pretrial hearing because prosecutors raided the offices 
without a court order. But Marwan is not worried. According to 
Marwan the search warrant can be requested later. "The raid on 
the PT Pos office was urgent," he said. 
Hana however asserts that he did not embezzle or inflate 
commissions as he has been accused. According to Hana, even if 
the AGO cites the inflation of commissions, this was actually 
done after reducing the discount percentage or initiative, the 
total of which is less then 13 percent. Hana said that this is 
not a violation of the regulations because there was another 
stipulation in the circular that referred to maximum 30 percent 
limits on fees for pre-posting, including discounts, commissions 
and incentives. Now, on the matter of this 30 percent limit, 
again there was a degree of flexibility. The thing is, in the 
circular it stated that regional postmasters are entitled to 
change or review the amount of money or percentage in order to 
obtain discounts, commissions and incentives. 
PT Pos spokesperson Joesman Kartaprawira also asserts that what 
Hana did was to simply pass on the contents of a PT Pos Director 
of Operation Circular to regional post offices under his 
jurisdiction. "The commissions were aimed at maintaining 
customer loyalty," he said. According to Joesman, the issue of 
the signatures by PT Pos officials on the commission receipts 
also cannot be said to violate the law. "The circular stated 
that if a recipient refuses to sign a receipt, it is enough for 
the recipient signature column to be signed by the official who 
hands over the commission or is appointed," he said. 
Because all of the suspects are citing the circular as their 
alibi, the AGO is currently investigating how and when it was 
issued. According to Marwan, the document clearly conflicts with 
a 2000 Ministerial Regulation on State-Owned Enterprises, 
because according to the regulation, government-owned companies 
are not allowed to accept commissions. "Meanwhile the majority 
of PT Pos' customers are government-owned companies." It does 
indeed appear that more "Pak Pos" are likely to be dragged into 
the case.